The question of FSK vs AFSK RTTY continues to be discussed. Each has its pros and cons, which have been touched on elsewhere. The main question for the moment is: what's the cleanest signal we can achieve? It's important to consider signal quality for a number of reasons.
For one, it is a requirement of our licensing to use the least power necessary to make the contact. As RTTY is primarily a contesting mode now, stations are often using significant power. As signals degrade, noise, harmonics and splatter affect operators trying to use adjacent frequencies. This is unsportsmanlike. Finally, a cleaner signal means whatever power we radiate is concentrated into the mark and space frequencies that make up the transmission. If we concentrate our power, our effective signal strength is better.
So how do you know if your signal is OK? One way is to use dedicated spectrum analyzers. When I wondered about the quality of FSK from my Icom 7300, I contacted Adam Farson (SK) for advice. He did some testing, and declared it was within spec. Those results are at the end of his very thorough Icom 7300 test report.
Most of us don't have access to dedicated spectrum analyzers. But many modern rigs have excellent spectrum displays. If a friend can listen, they can give real time feedback about the signal. Following are some examples.
In this case, the radio being tested is an Elecraft K3, running remotely near Buffalo, via a RemoteRig setup. An Alpha 9500 amp is running into a beam aimed west toward the receiving station in Chicago. The receiving station is using an EFHW on 40 and a hexbeam on 20, feeding an Icom 7610. Images were captured from screenshots of WFVIEW. Anydesk is used for screen sharing.
Aat 500W, FSK RTTY on a fading 20m band looks like this:
Hard to make an assessment with a signal this weak. So we moved to 40m.
On 40M, at 227W, FSK RTTY looks like this:
There is no splatter and there are no harmonics. The Elecraft K3 is known for a clean FSK RTTY signal and that's what we see.
From here, we change to AFSK RTTY. We are still on 40M. AFSK is generated by 2Tone, using DOOK, sent via Writelog.
Now we see splattering and harmonics. This is a bad signal! Even turning the mic gain and sound card levels way down, we could not make the signal better.
To fix this required a few steps. Software audio controls were NOT sufficient! Dropping audio levels very low still produced splatter.
The audio line from the soundcard needed an attenuator. We have been making these by splicing resistors into audio cables in a T-pad configuration. Crude, but essentially free. Online calculators will help determine the needed resistors. There are also inexpensive attenuators available for $10-20 but we haven't tried them.
The sound card level was dropped, and the mic gain was dropped. At this point we had very little power out. From there we slowly adjusted mic gain and audio levels back up until we saw peak power output but maintained a clean signal. Of note, the level of ALC flickering on the K3 was not an indicator of a clean signal.
We achieved signals like the following. The attenuator is in line, mic gain is at 40, the sound card level is at 20:
At this point, we'd like to know, how sensitive is the signal to sound card levels? If we have to readjust to very fine degrees, then AFSK is not going to be viable for contesting. Initial testing, though, indicates that there is a good range of audio levels that maintain clean signals.
Here we have raised the sound card level to 60 and we still have a very good signal with no splattering or harmonics.
And the now back down to 20:
Next we will check the signal on multiple bands, keeping audio levels constant. Good luck and happy contesting,
Ben N9TR and Chuck N8CL